The description is submitted to:


Session C5120 (Thematic Conversation-Global Histories of Slavery in the Premodern Middle East and Beyond), 2018
My current research highlights the opportunities for scholars that abound in juxtaposing underutilized medieval Arabic documentary sources with the literary works (chronicles, geographies, etc.) that have long served as the evidentiary bedrock for historiography of the premodern Middle East. There are literally thousands of unpublished medieval Arabic documents scattered across collections in Europe, the Middle East, and North America. In general, scholars of Islamic history have paid less attention to these sources due to the paleographic and other challenges inherent in rendering them legible as historical records.

Yet Arabic papyrologists have in fact published many documents-such as bills of sale for slaves and merchant letters-that shed light upon the quotidian practices of slave owners and traders. In addition, scholars working on the Judeo-Arabic sources from the Cairo Geniza (primarily pertaining to the period between 950 and 1250 CE) are publishing documents that illustrate how Jews, Muslims, and Christians in Egypt and beyond used domestic slaves; these studies also show how slaves themselves navigated legal systems and household structures.

Indeed, scholars can analyze such published documents alongside Arabic literary and legal sources such as chronicles and market-inspector manuals. In particular, historians can draw evidence from documents and literary sources to write histories of Muslim societies that integrate the "view from the ground" with the normative prescriptions found in these literary and legal texts. The study of slavery stands to contribute much to our understanding of greater medieval Middle Eastern societies. For instance, recent scholarship reveals the nature of social relationships between free women and their domestic slaves-a topic about which Arabic legal and literary sources are largely reticent. Documentary sources indicate how free women relied upon their slave women as practical kin and, after manumission, as clients and protégés. In this sense, domestic slavery provided some free women with social capital and also undergirded their most effective social networks. Further, free women then used the idea of the female owner-slave relationship to conceptualize and articulate idealized notions of kin relations between free persons.