New York State Senate passes bills to prohibit funding of university groups supporting boycott of allied nations

Assemblymember Carl E. Heastie
Speaker, New York State Assembly

Assemblymember Deborah J. Glick
Chair, Higher Education Committee
New York State Assembly

Dear Speaker Hastie and Assemblymember Glick,

We write to you on behalf of the Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA) and its Committee on Academic Freedom to express our deep concern over two bills – S2493 and S4837 – that were recently passed by the New York State Senate and have been referred to the New York State Assembly’s Higher Education Committee. If enacted into law, these bills would violate the principles of academic freedom and threaten the constitutionally protected free speech rights of students and faculty at New York’s institutions of higher education.

MESA was founded in 1966 to promote scholarship and teaching on the Middle East and North Africa. The preeminent organization in the field, the Association publishes the International Journal of Middle East Studies and has nearly 3000 members worldwide. MESA is committed to ensuring academic freedom and freedom of expression, both within the region and in connection with the study of the region in North America and elsewhere.

S2493 prohibits the State University of New York, the City University of New York and the state’s community colleges from providing funding to any student group or organization that “directly or indirectly promotes, encourages, or permits discrimination, intolerance, hate speech or boycotts against a person or group based on race, class, gender, nationality, ethnic origin or religion.” The bill goes on to specify that the prohibition of “boycott” applies only to a set of “allied nations,” including the State of Israel.

S4837 would legislate that “no college in this state may use state aid provided directly to such college to: fund an academic entity, provide funds for membership in an academic entity or fund travel or lodging for any employee to attend any meeting of such academic entity if such entity has issued a public resolution or other official statement or undertaken an official action boycotting a host country or higher education institutions located in such country.”

As we see it, S2493 would financially penalize student groups, including by denying them access to funds derived from their own student activity fees, simply because of their advocacy of certain political views. It thus clearly constitutes an assault on students’ academic freedom. Moreover, to enact legislation that denies public funding to student organizations that promote boycotts of  “allied nations” while permitting such funding to student groups that endorse boycotts of other nations is to make the United States government the arbiter of acceptable political speech and debate. The bill would thereby punish student organizations that express disagreement with the policies of the United States government and/or of certain foreign states – but not others.

Similarly, S4837 would violate the academic freedom and free speech rights of faculty at colleges and universities in New York that receive state aid by making it difficult or impossible for them to be members, or participate in the professional meetings, of an academic organization simply because it has endorsed a particular political position, in the form of advocating for a boycott of certain countries. Here too we see the government favoring one set of political opinions and perspectives while punishing another set.

In effect, these bills impose a kind of loyalty test, and as such they are unacceptable in a democracy. They also threaten the mission of New York’s institutions of higher education to promote the free and open exchange of ideas and opinions. We would also point out that the boycott is a time-honored form of political expression in the United States, and more generally in democratic societies. We further call your attention to the fact that these bills imply an equivalence between criticism (including boycotts) of the policies of “allied” foreign governments, on the one hand, and on the other “promoting discrimination, intolerance, and hate speech” against classes of people on the odious basis of race, ethnicity, national origin and religion. We believe that a clear distinction must be drawn between protesting the policies of an organization, corporate entity or country, and denigrating, discriminating against or promoting violence against an entire class of people.

It is, finally, a matter of serious concern to us that the history of proposed legislative and executive actions in New York in recent years suggests that the principal goal of these two bills is to use the power, authority and fiscal resources of the state government to silence and punish advocacy of a boycott directed at Israeli businesses or institutions by defining such advocacy not as constitutionally protected political speech but as a form of discrimination and bigotry against Jews. We invite you to review the Committee on Academic Freedom’s letters of February 6, 2014, and March 7 and June 16, 2016, available at As the American Civil Liberties Union noted in a letter dated June 27, 2016 regarding a similar bill: “Just as the government may not exercise its sovereign power against its people in retaliation for their political speech, it cannot deprive them of valuable financial benefits to chill their speech on matters of public concern without a compelling governmental interest – and unquestionably not because it prefers another view.”

New York State should not be in the business of trying to silence people who choose to exercise their right to free speech by advocating for some form of economic, cultural or academic boycott of Israel or any other nation. These bills pose a grave threat to academic freedom at New York’s institutions of higher education by means of their chilling effect on the expression of certain opinions and ideas. We therefore urge you to oppose passage of these bills by the New York State Assembly and to reiterate your firm commitment to the constitutionally protected right to freedom of speech and to the defense of academic freedom throughout New York State.

Yours sincerely,

Beth Baron                                                                                 
MESA President                                                                         
Professor, City University of New York                                 

Amy W. Newhall
MESA Executive Director
Associate Professor, University of Arizona


Stay Connected

MESA offers several ways to stay connected: Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, as well as listservs and trusty email notifications. To find out more, please follow the link below.

Connect Now